On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:17:57PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:41:28 -0400 > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:07:11PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote: > > > > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the > > > > latest version in this case? > > > > > > For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the > > > version used in my projects. Since the versions are quite > > > different, maybe we include both of them? > > > > I think we should package the latest version, at least. > > > > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' > > that inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited > > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use > > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. > > > > I'd prefer the latter option. I don't think we have a precedent of > > adding old releases, although we do sometimes keep them around for > > compatibility. But I could be mistaken. > > > > What do people think we should do? > > Yes I agree with the second alternative as well.
Okay, will you send a patch for it?
