On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > I think we should package the latest version, at least. > > > > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' that > > inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited > > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. > > It depends on whether pypump-0.6 is a major API-incompatible version > that is still required by other Free Software packages in the wild on > the internet. If so, it makes sense to carry it too. Otherwise not.
That would be a good reason to keep it. But so far, I haven't seen any patches that would use it :)
