> Thanks, but I wouldn't like to participate in such a discussion. Yeah, I get the feeling that no one does. That's why saying something is an FSDG issue is like saying "we won't accept your patch and won't discuss with you why".
> I just don't see a problem in accepting this patch as I don't > understand Mathieu's and Mark's concerns about FSDG compliance, but I'm > not competent in this area, so I let other people judge. Can you please explain why you don't feel competent? It's written in plain English, not AES encrypted English, so I have difficulty understanding why people think they can't read it and form an opinion about it (not this issue in particular, but more general any issue that comes up), and I don't just mean you either, but a few people have said this...
