David Craven (2016-08-10 17:13 +0300) wrote: >> Even so, if one insisted on using the recutils output in a programmatic >> fashion (e.g. in a bash script), it would be best to run “guix build >> --source” on the package names to obtain the actual source tarballs that >> are used by Guix. > > I don't disagree. Alex what do you think?
Do you mean about your original proposal? I am for it: I don't comprehend why the source URL can't be displayed (especially since a user can easily find it anyway), but I don't understand FSDG well enough to judge, so I prefer not to participate in this discussion. (I hope this thread will not tear Guix contributors apart) -- Alex
