> All: Please share your experiences, positive and negative, with project > management frameworks. Ideally it covers patches, discussions, > bugtracking and is accessible and usable at least via web browser.
I think a few people have said they like github, but it gets objected to because of certain reasons and I do not want to start a discussion on those. I did find a project called gogs (go git service) which has an ui just like github's. Maybe this would be a solution worth exploring. As for the "I like to use email thing": I like to reply via email to PR's and issues too, the only downside I can think of for people liking the email workflow would be creating a PR involves pressing the "Create PR" button in the web gui. (If I haven't thought of other downsides please let me know ;) Fetching peoples patchsets through git is simple, and there is the possiblility of adding forks of people that contribute regularly as git remotes (to make fetching and review even simpler). The only thing I don't like about github/gogs from an UI perspective is the merge button. The merge button creates unnecessary merge commits which I don't like, and many projects agree to not use the merge button. There is no way to disable it, but I think that disabling it in gogs would be trivial. [0] https://gogs.io
