Hi, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes: > >> iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes: >> >>> ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software >>>> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted >>>> there. >>>> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will >>>> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not >>>> $suckless but application xy. >>>> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches. >>> >>> Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages. >>> For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to >>> do with window managers. >>> >>> When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to >>> put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop. >> >> So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)? > > Fwiw, I'm in favor of keeping suckless.scm, and rejecting these proposed > package moves. > > Mark > Thanks for the comments, I did not see your replies until today. Okay, I'd say with your replied that we do not move it. The latest update of st I did in suckless.scm, so anyone who wants to update that can aply the patch. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
