iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes: > ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software >> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted >> there. >> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will >> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not >> $suckless but application xy. >> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches. > > Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages. > For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to > do with window managers. > > When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to > put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop.
So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)? -- Mathieu Lirzin
