Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes: > Hello, > > ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > >> Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes: >> >>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes: >>> >>>> Ludo', >>>> >>>> On 2016-07-19 23:00, l...@gnu.org wrote: >>>>> Applied, thanks! >>>> >>>> Thanks! I didn't know about @example. >>>> >>>> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but >>>> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations, >>>> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design? >>> >>> Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't >>> implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed. >>> >>> -- >>> Mathieu Lirzin >>> >> >> Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I >> don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it >> should be extended. > > Guile texinfo is maintained in Guile itself. You can send a bug report > to <bug-gu...@gnu.org>. > > Thanks! > > -- > Mathieu Lirzin
Thanks. I could, but I have no time to interact with it due to personal resources. It would be better if someone else did this. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
