Hello, ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes: >> >>> Ludo', >>> >>> On 2016-07-19 23:00, l...@gnu.org wrote: >>>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> Thanks! I didn't know about @example. >>> >>> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but >>> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations, >>> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design? >> >> Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't >> implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed. >> >> -- >> Mathieu Lirzin >> > > Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I > don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it > should be extended. Guile texinfo is maintained in Guile itself. You can send a bug report to <bug-gu...@gnu.org>. Thanks! -- Mathieu Lirzin
