Federico Beffa (2016-05-08 19:23 +0300) wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why >> does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of >> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to >> use "/share/emacs/site-lisp". >> >> I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their >> elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by >> default), and emacs-build-system can just use >> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories. >> >> "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think? > > Answer here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00398.html
No it is not :-) I think you miss-understood my point. You said that we should put emacs packages into subdirectories, and I agree with this, but instead of the current: ".../site-lisp/guix.d/PACKAGE-NAME-VERSION/" I suggest to use: ".../site-lisp/PACKAGE-NAME-VERSION/" i.e., to remove "guix.d". -- Alex
