On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why > does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of > "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to > use "/share/emacs/site-lisp". > > I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their > elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by > default), and emacs-build-system can just use > "/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories. > > "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think?
Answer here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00398.html Regards, Fede
