Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 03:22:03PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I propose to generalizing the specification [1,2] as we already have for >> Perl, Python and Java for most programming languages. In short: >> >> Package names should be prefixed with the name of the language and if >> the package name already contains the name of the language, it gets >> removed there. >> >> I quickly scanned the current package definitions and found: >> >> guile: 2 package to change >> haskell: ca. 2 package to be changed >> julia: 0 >> d (lcd.xscm): 0 >> nqc (lego.scm): 0 --> prefix "lego-"? OTOH this is a commercial brand >> lua: 0 >> m4: 0 >> ocaml: 1 >> ruby: 0 >> r (statistics.scm): 0 >> scheme: 1 or 2 >> smalltalk: 0 >> tcl: 0 > > What about C? Do we need c-linux-libre? ;)
Furthermore, what about multiple-language packages? I’m thinking of ‘c+guile-guile’ and ‘c+siod+python-gimp’. ;-) Ludo’.
