On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 03:22:03PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to generalizing the specification [1,2] as we already have for > Perl, Python and Java for most programming languages. In short: > > Package names should be prefixed with the name of the language and if > the package name already contains the name of the language, it gets > removed there. > > I quickly scanned the current package definitions and found: > > guile: 2 package to change > haskell: ca. 2 package to be changed > julia: 0 > d (lcd.xscm): 0 > nqc (lego.scm): 0 --> prefix "lego-"? OTOH this is a commercial brand > lua: 0 > m4: 0 > ocaml: 1 > ruby: 0 > r (statistics.scm): 0 > scheme: 1 or 2 > smalltalk: 0 > tcl: 0
What about C? Do we need c-linux-libre? ;)
