On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:32:01PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:38:46PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > I wonder if the version of git is a factor? 2.1.4 vs 2.6.3. Jan was also > > using 2.1.4, and his patches also failed *only* on the attribution line. > > Thank you Leo and Andreas for restoring my sanity! > > I'll upgrade git. I was using the newer version in my build > environment but generating the patch in an older version. Also locales > I need to settle on. I tend to have en_GB on Debian, but in a guix > shell it may act strange if I don't specify locales. > > And I won't add attribution again ;). I.e., the combination of being > an old git, having wrong locales and injecting self-attribution, was > lethal.
Does this mean the old version of git doesn't generate patches with the correct locale? I wonder... where is everyone getting git 2.1.4 from? It's 2 years old ;) > > Pj.
