On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > I used diffoscope to compare the non-working patch and a "should-be" > identical patch that I generated locally. The only differences were in > the patch headers and the encoding of the file (UTF-8 vs ISO-8859-1).
I think that explains it: The non-working part of the patch was the copyright line, which contains the copyright symbol! So let us all move to utf-8! Andreas
