Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> skribis: > On 16/11/2015, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
[...] >> Sometimes there are ready-made patches that can be found in Debian or >> other distros, sometimes not. Often they’re hard to find though (for >> instance, patch-tracker.debian.org seems to be off-line.) >> > Yes, according to > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg00889.html>, the > maintainer of patch-tracker.debian.org has been missing in action > until now. I think the website will be off-line in the near future. OK. >> “guix challenge” is a simple way to find out which packages are non >> deterministic. That’s how I found about those that can be seen at >> <http://bugs.gnu.org/guix> for example. >> > Does that mean we should have a bug report for every non-reproducible > packages? Or should we only have bug reports for popular packages? It’s OK to have bug reports for any package, as long as people volunteer to fix the bugs. Often it’s a trivial timestamp issue; sometimes it’s more involved, like <http://bugs.gnu.org/21918>. Does Debbugs allow us to add custom tags? We could have a “determinism” tag to facilitate triage. Ludo’.
