Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-09 15:40 +0300) wrote:
[...] >> Can’t ‘sdl-union’ be used here? I think it was created specifically to >> solve this problem. (Currently it’s private to (gnu packages sdl) but >> you can export it.) > > Oh, great, I didn't know about it, thanks! It will reduce the workaround. > > However, just using this package cannot solve the problem: 'sdl-config' > points directly to "/gnu/store/…-sdl-1.2.15", so you need to modify a > package anyway to make it find "/gnu/store/…-sdl-union-1.2.15/include/SDL" > (that's why 'guile-sdl' specifies "--with-sdl-prefix="). Oh. :-/ Then I guess you can go with the original patch, which LGTM. Thanks, Ludo’.
