On Tue 25 Aug 2015 16:55, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis: > >> * gnu/services/base.scm (mingetty-service): >> * gnu/services/xorg.scm (slim-service): >> * gnu/services/ssh.scm (lsh-service): >> * gnu/system/linux.scm (unix-pam-service, base-pam-services): Add >> #:additional-session-modules keyword argument. > > I wonder if we really need #:additional-session-modules passed around. > > My first suggestion would be to do ‘unix-pam-service’ or > ‘base-pam-services’ in the OS declaration along these lines: > > (operating-system > ;; ... > (pam-services (map (lambda (service) > (pam-service > (inherit service) > (session (cons ...)))) > (base-pam-services)))) > > But maybe that turned out to be inconvenient? If so, perhaps we could > solve it by introducing helper procedures, like > ‘add-pam-service-session’ or something? > > Or am I missing something? :-) > > BTW, I realize we should rename (gnu system linux) to (gnu system pam) > and then document it in the manual.
How would that work for other services like slim, mingetty, etc?
