Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis:
> * gnu/services/base.scm (mingetty-service):
> * gnu/services/xorg.scm (slim-service):
> * gnu/services/ssh.scm (lsh-service):
> * gnu/system/linux.scm (unix-pam-service, base-pam-services): Add
> #:additional-session-modules keyword argument.
I wonder if we really need #:additional-session-modules passed around.
My first suggestion would be to do ‘unix-pam-service’ or
‘base-pam-services’ in the OS declaration along these lines:
(operating-system
;; ...
(pam-services (map (lambda (service)
(pam-service
(inherit service)
(session (cons ...))))
(base-pam-services))))
But maybe that turned out to be inconvenient? If so, perhaps we could
solve it by introducing helper procedures, like
‘add-pam-service-session’ or something?
Or am I missing something? :-)
BTW, I realize we should rename (gnu system linux) to (gnu system pam)
and then document it in the manual.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
