l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > >> Please, let's not do that. We should be moving in the other direction, >> by using less, not more, of the unbelievably massive amount of bundled >> stuff in Qt. > > Agreed. > >> If this "fix" is the really best we can hope for from upstream, then >> let's do it this way instead: after unpacking Qt 5, make a copy of >> glext.h from *our* system Mesa, apply the above patch to that copy, and >> arrange for that patched copy to be found first in the include search >> path during the Qt build. Then at least we will have only one copy of >> Mesa in memory and only one copy of the Mesa source code to maintain >> (for security fixes, fixes for non-Intel platforms, fixes for Guix, >> etc). > > Sounds like a good plan. > >> Thanks again, Taylan, for working on this unpleasant task. > > Indeed, this is neither easy nor funny, but work in this area is > definitely appreciated! > > Thanks, > Ludo’.
Seems I left this thread dangling; I sent a new patch in a new thread on the meanwhile. And it even seems to work this time. :-) Taylan
