Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > Please, let's not do that. We should be moving in the other direction, > by using less, not more, of the unbelievably massive amount of bundled > stuff in Qt.
Agreed. > If this "fix" is the really best we can hope for from upstream, then > let's do it this way instead: after unpacking Qt 5, make a copy of > glext.h from *our* system Mesa, apply the above patch to that copy, and > arrange for that patched copy to be found first in the include search > path during the Qt build. Then at least we will have only one copy of > Mesa in memory and only one copy of the Mesa source code to maintain > (for security fixes, fixes for non-Intel platforms, fixes for Guix, > etc). Sounds like a good plan. > Thanks again, Taylan, for working on this unpleasant task. Indeed, this is neither easy nor funny, but work in this area is definitely appreciated! Thanks, Ludo’.
