I found tcsh in packages list and maybe missed some other shells. Seems like we need more general solution than patch proposed by me. Also maybe merge all shells to a new common package "gnu shells" instead of separate packages?
2015-03-11 1:30 GMT+03:00 Axel <gra...@gmail.com>: > Thank you for explanation, I installed these packages system wide and > got symbolic links. I prepared the patch for gnu/system.scm but I > unsure about the way I used to check packages availability > (find-packages-by-name). I see only the problem when one user > installed the package and other don't — the new shell will be added to > the list anyway. But I not found how to check that package was > installed system wide. > > And generally should we check that shells really installed or just > unconditionally add paths to /etc/shells? I will modify patch then. > > > > 2015-03-09 11:59 GMT+03:00 Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org>: >> Axel <gra...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> Could we append /etc/shells with `zsh` or `fish` paths after these >>> shells installed in the system? >> >> Sure! Would you like to submit a patch? This is in gnu/system.scm. >> >>> And I think these shells should be linked to >>> /run/current-system/profile/bin/ as `bash` does. >> >> To do that, all you need to do is to add them to the ‘packages’ field of >> the ‘operating-system’ declaration: >> >> (operating-system >> ;; ... >> (packages (cons* fish zsh %base-packages))) >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo’. > > > > -- > Александр Графов -- Александр Графов
