Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...] >>> + ;; From LICENSE.md: >>> + ;; "The OpenLibm code derives from the FreeBSD msun and OpenBSD libm >>> + ;; implementations, which in turn derives from FDLIBM 5.3. As a >>> result, it >>> + ;; has a number of fixes and updates that have accumulated over the >>> years >>> + ;; in msun, and also optimized assembly versions of many functions. >>> These >>> + ;; improvements are provided under the BSD and ISC licenses. The msun >>> + ;; library also includes work placed under the public domain, which is >>> + ;; noted in the individual files. Further work on making a standalone >>> + ;; OpenLibm library from msun, as part of the Julia project is covered >>> + ;; under the MIT license. The test files, test-double.c and >>> test-float.c >>> + ;; are under the LGPL." >>> + (license (list license:expat license:isc license:bsd-2 >>> license:lgpl2.1+)))) >> >> Compared to the paragraph, the list misses ‘license:x11’. > > It mentions the MIT license, so I used "license:expat". I don't think > the X11 license is meant, because the MIT license declaration on > https://github.com/JuliaLang/openlibm/blob/master/LICENSE.md does not > include the advertisement clause. Sounds like you’re right, sorry for the confusion. > The list does miss license:public-domain, however. Right. > From f7732d683e3dee75c3ce7a8a65dd2c1548dabb32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> > Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:07:13 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openlibm. > > * gnu/packages/maths.scm (openlibm): New variable. LGTM. Thanks for your patience, Ludo’.
