Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > From 636e19fd0649cf18264dde64f76449f6b5d8e70c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> > Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:07:13 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openlibm. > > * gnu/packages/maths.scm (openlibm): New variable.
[...] > + (synopsis "System-independent, portable libm implementation") What about “Portable C mathematical library (libm)”? > + ;; From LICENSE.md: > + ;; "The OpenLibm code derives from the FreeBSD msun and OpenBSD libm > + ;; implementations, which in turn derives from FDLIBM 5.3. As a result, > it > + ;; has a number of fixes and updates that have accumulated over the years > + ;; in msun, and also optimized assembly versions of many functions. These > + ;; improvements are provided under the BSD and ISC licenses. The msun > + ;; library also includes work placed under the public domain, which is > + ;; noted in the individual files. Further work on making a standalone > + ;; OpenLibm library from msun, as part of the Julia project is covered > + ;; under the MIT license. The test files, test-double.c and test-float.c > + ;; are under the LGPL." > + (license (list license:expat license:isc license:bsd-2 > license:lgpl2.1+)))) Compared to the paragraph, the list misses ‘license:x11’. Also, it’s enough to write “See LICENSE.md for details.” No need to copy the whole text IMO. OK to push with these changes. Thank you! Ludo’.
