Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output > path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH?
It already does. > In texlive I see lines such as > patch-shebang: ./texmf-dist/tex/luatex/lualibs/lualibs-compat.lua: warning: > no binary for interpreter `texlua' found in $PATH (And the mention of $PATH in this message is misleading.) > The file starts with > #!/usr/bin/env texlua > and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlua is > a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex). Could it be that the symlink doesn’t exist yet at the time the ‘patch-shebangs’ phase runs? HTH, Ludo’.
