Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-19 16:24:17) > Ian Denhardt <i...@zenhack.net> skribis: > > > How about this: separate it out into to functions: version-prefix, which > > is the same as what I have now, but takes a (mandatory) argument > > specifying the number of fields, and feature-version, which is defined > > like: > > > > (define (feature-version version) (version-prefix version 2)) > > > > ..with an appropriate docstring explaining the use case. Thoughts? > > Sounds good to me, although I’d rather call ‘feature-version’, say, > ‘version-major+minor’, on the grounds that the semantics of version > numbers are specific to each project. Mark?
Sounds good to me; I'll update the patch soon. -Ian
signature.asc
Description: signature
