Ian Denhardt <i...@zenhack.net> skribis: > How about this: separate it out into to functions: version-prefix, which > is the same as what I have now, but takes a (mandatory) argument > specifying the number of fields, and feature-version, which is defined > like: > > (define (feature-version version) (version-prefix version 2)) > > ..with an appropriate docstring explaining the use case. Thoughts?
Sounds good to me, although I’d rather call ‘feature-version’, say, ‘version-major+minor’, on the grounds that the semantics of version numbers are specific to each project. Mark? (Please forgive the extra bikeshedding. ;-)) Thanks, Ludo’.
