Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com> skribis: > You could use something like 'parcels' (maybe too close in meaning to > package) or 'containers' (maybe too long). Both would build on the idea > that you can have packages inside a parcel, or container — much like bag > probably does as well (as in santa clause's bag of presents/packages).
Actually I was trying to convey the idea that a “bag” is a “package” with less ornamentation, if you see what I mean (because bags are low-level representations of packages.) So I think these suggestions wouldn’t work well (and “containers” could be confused with Linux containers.) Thanks anyway. :-) Ludo’.
