Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> skribis: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:33:53PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> >>> [...] called “bags.” >>> >>> "Bags" can be too easily misread/typed as "bugs". >> >> But I’m open to suggestions (the synonyms that WordNet suggests aren’t >> good.) > > You could use something like 'parcels' (maybe too close in meaning to > package) or 'containers' (maybe too long). Both would build on the idea > that you can have packages inside a parcel, or container — much like bag > probably does as well (as in santa clause's bag of presents/packages).
I like the simplicity of "bags". "Sack" might also work, but might not be as good if we are worried about people who are a/u-dyslexic ;) -- Eric Bavier Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
