GPT is interesting, to whom may also interested in, I've tried to use GPT to generate friend error message for compiler.
https://nalaginrut.com/archives/2023/03/12/use%20chatgpt%20for%20compiler%20error%20regeneration On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 07:27 Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: > > <to...@tuxteam.de> writes: > > > which has tried to be free (in both senses). For images, there is > > Stable Diffusion (disclaimer:I don't know much about them). For > > raw data, there's Common Crawl [3], which is Stable Diffusion's > > Stable diffusion has one of the most evil licenses I’ve read till now: > using its images seems to be allowed for almost all proprietary uses, > but illegal for free culture use. See the explicit questions about that > here: https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/issues/131 > > A license that makes its output only usable for proprietary creations > but not for free culture is like the polar opposite of the GPL or CC > by-sa: making a tool that gives proprietary creations an advantage over > Free Culture. > > Some quotes: > > > Does this mean that the CreativeML Open RAIL-M license makes output > > from the model incompatible with copyleft Free Culture and Free > > Software licenses, so it would for example be illegal to use any of > > the output in Wikipedia? Is there legal uncertainty about that? > … > > The first thing to say is that this license is about as far away from > > open source as it could possibly get. > … > >> "No use of the output can contravene any provision as stated in the > License.". > > > A Japanese lawyer I know told me that, in general terms, releasing > > output under the CC-BY could be a violation of the license if such a > > provision exists. (* He is not familiar with this license and has not > > reviewed it in detail) > > No answer from the developers. > > Best wishes, > Arne > -- > Unpolitisch sein > heißt politisch sein, > ohne es zu merken. > draketo.de >
