On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 11:53 AM James Crake-Merani <ja...@jamescm.co.uk>
wrote:
> On 18/03/2023 08:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > My take is that such potentially society-shattering technologies
> > don't belong in the hands of corporations which have no choice
> > but to maximize their return on investment. But perhaps that's me.
>
> Yes, I find it concerning that this technology is owned by OpenAI which
> is a for profit company. Because, as you say, for profit companies are
> not necessarily interested in the societal benefits that new technology
> brings along but rather the profits that can be made off this technology.
>
One problem with trying to preserve freedom wrt AI is that training on
large data requires a lot of computational resources. It would be nice if
there were some kind of non-profit organization ("FreeAI"?) where people
who want free AI pool their resources. I guess in this case it can't be
financed the same way as Wikipedia but there would have to be a
subscription fee.
