I wrote: > Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also > less precise than it should be.
Sorry, I was mistaken about this. Our 'string->number' is fine. Mark
I wrote: > Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also > less precise than it should be.
Sorry, I was mistaken about this. Our 'string->number' is fine. Mark