To clarify, he used wrong usage of http-get is another issue need to be
noticed.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I must say NO to NO.
> You may try http-get directly in this situation and see if it returns. No
> matter how you handle the values, it never return because of the error I
> mentioned.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > I'm afraid it's a real bug.
>> No, it's not. See my response to him. :)
>>
>> --
>> Ian Price
>>
>> "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
>> the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"
>>
>
>

Reply via email to