Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Kevin Ryde wrote: > >> Otherwise if you think there's a function but no prototype we could >> put a prototype in (when not otherwise provided). > > that sounds like the best approach to me. There is a definition to > be picked up when one is not available, so this seems sensible.
What would work? Just int isnan (double); In c99 it's a macro that adapts to the size of the input, but I'd expect a function version to take a double. > I still haven't found a good source of info for C99. The K&R book > was updated for ANSI C but not C99 yet. There's a draft standard kicking around the net, google for "n869", or check http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n869/ Not tremendously helpful as such though. > I have spent two weeks updating GNU stuff. This insistance on > the absolute latest versions of everything for a build is immensely > frustrating. For a build it's not meant to be necessary. For developers though there's no virtue in bugwards compatibility to old bits. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user