On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>
> That's designed to force all users to be developers :-(.
Should that be in the *release* then? Prior to release definitely
makes sense.
>
> >> numbers.c: In function 'xisinf':
> >> numbers.c:147: warning: implicit declaration of function 'isinf'
>
> You might be able to just stick in a prototype,
Tried to do that, it still complained about it.
> or alternately just
> "./configure --disable-error-on-warning".
Hmmmm, I'll give that a go.
>
> > I can't get it to pickup the definition from the Sun Workshop includes.
>
> Dunno if gcc is meant to do that, probably not.
I pointed -I to the appropriate place, but no joy.
>
> > The sun man page for isinf claims that it is available in sunmath.h
> > which we don't have in /usr/include.
>
> We could include that (when available) if you think it'd do any good.
Well, I don't understand why it is documented in `man isinf` and yet
we don't have it.
> Otherwise if you think there's a function but no prototype we could
> put a prototype in (when not otherwise provided).
that sounds like the best approach to me. There is a definition to
be picked up when one is not available, so this seems sensible.
>
> Perhaps there's a c99 mode for the headers that would give isinf and
> isnan, but I'd expect that to be more painful than workarounds for the
> default mode.
I still haven't found a good source of info for C99. The K&R book
was updated for ANSI C but not C99 yet.
>
> > autoconf configure.in > configure
> > with
> > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60
>
> We're probably on 2.61 by now, though that shouldn't make a
I have spent two weeks updating GNU stuff. This insistance on
the absolute latest versions of everything for a build is immensely
frustrating.
> difference. You might check you can regenerate without any changes
> before attempting some. You probably need gnu m4, though I'd expect
GNU M4 1.4.8
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Rene' Seindal.
> autoconf to complain if it's only got the system one.
>
> PS. bug-guile is list to use for bugs (ie. something not working).
Yes, but I haven't actually established this is a bug yet. I may
have missed some detailed step that I should have taken, to make the
definition come out correctly after all the macro work.
Thank you,
Hugh
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
