>I don't talk nonsense with you, and I didn't against your opinions even for >your nonsense. >The only thing I care is that, are you ready to back to the coding part, and >show your code than cheap talking, now? This isn’t exactly what I wrote about in my last e-mail, but it’s a similar kind of nonsense I don’t want to deal with either (the generalisation Is trivial so nothing needs to be shown, what you are claiming is different from what you are doing, and I did no cheap talking), so consider yourself added to the blocklist. Bye, Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tes... Nala Ginrut
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests for `for-rdeli... Mikael Djurfeldt
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests for `for-r... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests for `f... Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests f... Nala Ginrut
- RE: [PATCH] test-suite: Add tests f... Maxime Devos
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] rdelim: Add new procedure `for-rdelim-in-... Nala Ginrut