On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > > What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which > would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’.
'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different implementation of it? - Dave
