Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> skribis: >> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) >> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:11:19 +0200 >> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org >> >> Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> skribis: >> >> > In GDB, Guile is just an extension language. I see no catastrophe in >> > saying there are some restrictions to what a Guile extension in GDB >> > can and cannot do. >> >> That can be acceptable, but requiring users to re-build Guile and GC >> without thread support is not, IMO. > > Perhaps we should request GC and Guile to provide capabilities to > disable threads at run time, then.
I don’t think we need to go this far: reading the recent discussions, it seems Doug found a way to make sure Guile’s and libgc’s internal threads don’t receive signals that GDB is interested in, which should be enough for practical purposes. Ludo’.
