> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:11:19 +0200
> Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> skribis:
> 
> > In GDB, Guile is just an extension language.  I see no catastrophe in
> > saying there are some restrictions to what a Guile extension in GDB
> > can and cannot do.
> 
> That can be acceptable, but requiring users to re-build Guile and GC
> without thread support is not, IMO.

Perhaps we should request GC and Guile to provide capabilities to
disable threads at run time, then.


Reply via email to