Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> +(define (hash-keys table) >>> + "Return all the keys from hash table." >>> + (hash-map->list (lambda (x y) x) table)) >> >> That doesn’t seem sufficiently common to warrant a new procedure. WDYT? > > FWIW, I think it would be reasonable to add 'hash-keys'. Many users > are accustomed to writing in a style that's made more convenient by > 'hash-keys', and in cases where efficiency is not crucial, I think > it's a fine style. Also, sometimes the values aren't needed. > > IMO, we can afford to add a few conveniences such as this.
Yes, I agree with this statement. It turns out that I don’t see how/when one would use ‘hash-keys?’. Any examples? No strong feeling about this one anyway, so if you think it makes sense, that’s fine with me. Ludo’.
