Hi! Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Well, could you point me out how can I get the amount of items with > hash-count in constant time? You can’t, but Daniel is arguing that this should not be needed in the first place, which makes sense to me. > IMO, return the count of inner record is most explicit way. As an added complication, it would be inaccurate for weak hash tables. Ludo’.
