Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: > Indeed, (local-eval '(set! x 5) <env>) is _not_ equivalent to > (module-set! (current-module) 'x 5).
To clarify: I was thinking about (local-eval '(set! x 5) <env>) vs (local-eval '(module-set! (current-module) 'x 5) <env>) > Assuming that `x' is not locally bound within the captured lexical > environment, the first sets `x' in the module captured by > (the-environment), i.e. the module where `x' would have been set if you > had put (set! x 5) in place of (the-environment). The second sets `x' > in the (current-module) at the time of evaluation. Yes, that would be what I would expect given the two local-eval calls above. -- David Kastrup
