Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > On Sat 14 Jan 2012 09:59, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > >> so that (define x 5) inside of local-eval would _not_ be equivalent to >> (module-define! (current-module) 'x 5) as the first one would take the >> current module at the-environment time, and the second one would take >> it at local-eval time. > > This would be a lexical definition, and probably not allowed by the > current code.
Two half-sentences, and each one makes me go WHAT!?!?!?! I assume that "this" means "the second one". Why would a module-define! call be a lexical definition? And why would it not be allowed by "the current code" and what does "the current code" mean in that context? -- David Kastrup
