Hi all, > >> So what do you all think about: > >> > >> (define-module (foo) > >> #:import ((bar) > >> (only (baz) qux foo) > >> ...)) > >> > >> Or even: > >> > >> (define-module (foo) > >> (import (bar) > >> (only (baz) qux foo) > >> ...)) > > > > I’d prefer #:use-modules (plural), for consistency: > > > > (define-module (foo) > > #:use-modules ((bar) > > (baz) #:select (qux foo) > > (chbouib) #:renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'p))) > > > > What do you think? > > I don't like the paren placement so much. Consistency is important, but > TBH I think that we should phase out the "use-module" / "use-modules" > terminology, in favor of "import" terminology of r6rs and the coming > r7rs. > > What do you think about that? :-) > > Andy
I 'feel' that a module uses another or several other modules. I feel that 'import' is too close to some sort of 'cuisine interne', to my HO. Therefore I would prefer, consistently with myself :), #:use-modules What would be a must for me, and may be others ?, would be having a possibility within 'define-module', to specify or globally or per used modules, that we also wish to re export their public interface. Cheers, David
