On Thu, Jul 28 2011, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi, > > I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a > Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an > rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what > was needed. In the middle of making a keyboard macro to add > #:use-module before the library names, I realized that `library' is > actually a lot better in this regard, in that you just have one `import' > block, and all the libraries are listed there without having a prefix on > each one. > > So what do you all think about: > > (define-module (foo) > #:import ((bar) > (only (baz) qux foo) > ...)) > > Or even: > > (define-module (foo) > (import (bar) > (only (baz) qux foo) > ...))
fwiw, i like the second form better (looks more schemish to me), and i agree both forms are an improvement over #:use-module. jao -- I don't necessarily agree with everything I say. -Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980)
