Hi,

> Not that I have any say in that, but IMHO, it would be preferable to
> keep external libraries maintained separatly from the Guile core;
> however in this case, including it in the core might be justified by its
> proposed use in the JIT compiler.

Yeah. I agree, actually.

> FWIW, there's already an R6RS adaption of "fmt"[1] as part of the Wak
> project[0], which works nicely with Guile (from the stable-2.0 branch).

Oh, I didn't realize that. We should certainly use that, then. I'll
try to take a look at it soon, if I have time.

Noah

Reply via email to