Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> I saw your message and thought this should hit the list:
>
> On Sat 12 Feb 2011 20:45, Mark Weaver <WEBMAIL_ADDRESS_REMOVED> writes:
>
>> BTW, this is all based on my experience adding new number types to
>> guile. I have a local branch in which both arbitrary precision floats
>> and complex numbers with arbitrary component types are implemented
>> entirely in scheme, and all the core numeric procedures are
>> implemented to full precision, including transcendental operations,
>> and all of it passes numbers.test. Even things like the numeric type
>> predicates (number?, real? et al), and eqv? and equal? work as they
>> should for these numbers. I was trying to get it ready for 2.0, but
>> decided to wait.
>
> Very neat stuff!
Thanks, Andy. I'll post patches and write more about this soon, but for
now I don't want to distract from the 2.0 release.
BTW, please don't expect me to see anything you send to that webmail
account. I created it for emergency use only, and check it once per
blue moon, probably less.
Best,
Mark
