Hi Mark, I saw your message and thought this should hit the list:
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 20:45, Mark Weaver <mark_weaver...@yahoo.com> writes: > BTW, this is all based on my experience adding new number types to > guile. I have a local branch in which both arbitrary precision floats > and complex numbers with arbitrary component types are implemented > entirely in scheme, and all the core numeric procedures are > implemented to full precision, including transcendental operations, > and all of it passes numbers.test. Even things like the numeric type > predicates (number?, real? et al), and eqv? and equal? work as they > should for these numbers. I was trying to get it ready for 2.0, but > decided to wait. Very neat stuff! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
