Hi, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes: >> >>> I noticed that the docs on the Guile web pages are a bit out of date. >>> The 1.8 ones are behind those in 1.8.7 (the latest release). >> >> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/index.html appears to >> correspond to 1.8.7. > > Yes, but amusingly this copy of the manual is only linked from the > "support for many SRFIs" link on > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/guile.html, and from inside Daniel's > tutorial. And from http://gnu.org/manual/ . > If you follow the more prominent links from > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/, you get to > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/index.html, > which is still at version 1.8.1. > > So, anyway, I think we agree that this needs sorting out! Indeed. I think I’ve always been updating the one at guile/manual, since it’s the usual way to place GNU manuals, but I must have forgotten to check the links under guile/. I’d be in favor or removing ‘docs-1.8’ and keeping just ‘manual’. What do you think? >> (BTW, Gnulib has a new script to automate updates to >> www.gnu.org/software/PROJECT/manual.) > > Right; I assume you mean gendocs.sh. I was thinking about the ‘gnu-web-doc-update’ module. >> I hadn't done it so far, mostly because 1.9 is alpha, and I think >> gnu.org/software/guile/manual should point to the current stable series. >> That said, perhaps we could put them in a sub-directory. > > Yes, that's what I had in mind, linked from > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html. OK. > Do you have strong views on whether we should use current Git or the > latest pre-release? I don't think it matters much, and current Git is > marginally easier. Either way is fine with me. Thank you! Ludo’.
