l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes: > >> I noticed that the docs on the Guile web pages are a bit out of date. >> The 1.8 ones are behind those in 1.8.7 (the latest release). > > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/index.html appears to > correspond to 1.8.7.
Yes, but amusingly this copy of the manual is only linked from the "support for many SRFIs" link on http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/guile.html, and from inside Daniel's tutorial. If you follow the more prominent links from http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/, you get to http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/index.html, which is still at version 1.8.1. So, anyway, I think we agree that this needs sorting out! > (BTW, Gnulib has a new script to automate updates to > www.gnu.org/software/PROJECT/manual.) Right; I assume you mean gendocs.sh. >> Would anyone object if we added a 1.9/2.0 set, and updated all these to >> correspond to the latest available (i.e. from CVS/Git) in each release >> series? > > I hadn't done it so far, mostly because 1.9 is alpha, and I think > gnu.org/software/guile/manual should point to the current stable series. > That said, perhaps we could put them in a sub-directory. Yes, that's what I had in mind, linked from http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html. Do you have strong views on whether we should use current Git or the latest pre-release? I don't think it matters much, and current Git is marginally easier. Regards, Neil
